<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alchemy United &#124; Your vision . Our passion . Success realized &#187; Yahoo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alchemyunited.com/tag/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alchemyunited.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google isn&#8217;t always the greatest &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/08/24/google-isnt-always-the-greatest-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/08/24/google-isnt-always-the-greatest-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Simchock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-commerce & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guest Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips, Tricks, Resources & How Tos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNNMoney.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alchemyunited.com/?p=1290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick addendum to the previous post on Google and Yahoo. First, here is the link to Yahoo&#8217;s Finance page: http://finance.yahoo.com/. And here&#8217;s Google&#8217;s: http://www.google.com/finance. As you dip your toes into Yahoo&#8217;s water you&#8217;ll notice similar aesthetics that often overshadows Google&#8217;s more utilitarian approach. In addition, here&#8217;s a quickie from CNN Money: &#8220;Do you Yahoo? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/08/24/google-isnt-always-the-greatest-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google isn&#8217;t always the greatest</title>
		<link>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/08/23/google-isnt-always-the-greatest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/08/23/google-isnt-always-the-greatest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Simchock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-commerce & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guest Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips, Tricks, Resources & How Tos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alchemyunited.com/?p=1287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Where Yahoo Leaves Google in the Dust&#8221; By Randall Stross (New York Times, 22 August 2009). While the Google hype machine would like you to believe otherwise, Google is not perfect. Yes, they are a damn good advertising machine but there are plenty examples of failed Google projects that were eventually sacked. If fact, that&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/08/23/google-isnt-always-the-greatest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Targeting Search Engine Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2008/08/11/targeting-search-engine-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2008/08/11/targeting-search-engine-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Simchock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-commerce & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forward Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO, SEM & Emailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks & Online Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To Who It May Concern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Retailer Mag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.au00.com/au/wp_blog/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Targeting Search Engine Rankings&#8221; by Jonathon Love from Internet Retailer (www.InternetRetailer.com) not only aims to shine some light on the stepchild of search (i.e., organic search,not paid search) but it actually stumbles upon something very interesting that inspired a letter from AU to Jon and IR. Good morning Jon Interesting article. Thanks. However, the other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2008/08/11/targeting-search-engine-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

