<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Give more get more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/10/04/give-more-get-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/10/04/give-more-get-more/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hrywna</title>
		<link>http://www.alchemyunited.com/2009/10/04/give-more-get-more/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hrywna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alchemyunited.com/?p=1414#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Mark,

 -- Sorry, I mixed up some #s in my original story. The totals are correct but I should clarify the averages. The $100 avg gift I cite was the avg of 200 donors who gave $80+, not the overall avg, which was ~$73 ($42k/577). [Avg for donors who gave &lt;$80 was ~$54]

 -- Only offered to lapsed members (15mos w/o giving) b/c they were looking to see if they could stimulate them to give. Renewal efforts are sent to KCSM members reaching expiration of membership (one year from last “give”). Once a member surpasses 15 months without giving, KCSM tests new ways to get them to join.

 -- No control was mailed but past lapsed efforts have yielded &lt;1% response. This package had 6+% response.

 -- They considered Zazzle but too expensive (they cited $18+ for Zazzle), and they also were looking for a high-quality shirt. The agency worked with one of their preferred premium vendors.

 -- Mailing labels: I&#039;ve heard that&#039;s how some nonprofits dip their toe into premiums before trying other items. If they&#039;re not considered premiums, albeit low-end, it&#039;s news to me.

 Hope that clarifies a bit. Apologies for the confusion on avg gift, etc. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p> &#8212; Sorry, I mixed up some #s in my original story. The totals are correct but I should clarify the averages. The $100 avg gift I cite was the avg of 200 donors who gave $80+, not the overall avg, which was ~$73 ($42k/577). [Avg for donors who gave &lt;$80 was ~$54]</p>
<p> &#8212; Only offered to lapsed members (15mos w/o giving) b/c they were looking to see if they could stimulate them to give. Renewal efforts are sent to KCSM members reaching expiration of membership (one year from last “give”). Once a member surpasses 15 months without giving, KCSM tests new ways to get them to join.</p>
<p> &#8212; No control was mailed but past lapsed efforts have yielded &lt;1% response. This package had 6+% response.</p>
<p> &#8212; They considered Zazzle but too expensive (they cited $18+ for Zazzle), and they also were looking for a high-quality shirt. The agency worked with one of their preferred premium vendors.</p>
<p> &#8212; Mailing labels: I&#039;ve heard that&#039;s how some nonprofits dip their toe into premiums before trying other items. If they&#039;re not considered premiums, albeit low-end, it&#039;s news to me.</p>
<p> Hope that clarifies a bit. Apologies for the confusion on avg gift, etc. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

